The Right Decision

Beginning at the end of February 2011, I earnestly began a job search. It was time for me to return to the workforce. After several months of diligently applying for positions and attending numerous interviews, I found myself with employment. Terms negotiated and I was set to start on July 11, 2011. The position: to market and promote a non-profit private foundation and to provide key executive administrative support to the founder of the company.

On Wednesday, September 9 (about two months after I started), I was handed a severance check. What happened?

During the interview process, the CEO and the founder believed that the IRS Form 1023 Application to become a 501(c)3 non-profit corporation was completed and filed. Status of the filing needed to be followed up on and a fundraising campaign to be developed. Great. “Where’s a copy of the application?” I asked.

After five weeks, it became clear that the application had not been filed as it had never been completed. The paperwork had been filed with the State of Nevada but not the Federal Government. There were several indicators of this:

  1. 1. A check was never made to the IRS to submit with the application.
  2. 2. No Conflict of Interest Policy was written among numerous other policies and requirements.
  3. 3. No EIN number was assigned.
  4. 4. No one could produce a completed copy of the application.

I informed the executive team and began to complete the intensive form. Shortly thereafter, a list of 21 key items was laid out. Samples of key policies were given to the founder. He believed it would be as easy as cut and paste. Unfortunately, it isn’t.

I started with the Conflict of Interest Policy knowing this would be the toughest and biggest challenge. The founder of the profit corporation wanted to start the non-profit so he could raise funds to purchase the profit corporation’s products and to funnel those donations as R&D and manufacturing capital to the profit corporation. The founder owns well over 50% of the profit corporation.

Keep in mind I’m not an attorney but this is a HUGE conflict of interest. It didn’t sit well with me nor did it sit well with the other executives. The founder saw no problem with this philosophy.

As part of my contract negotiation, I requested vacation time off at the end of August for my annual trip to the desert. Just before I left, the founder made plans to meet with a non-profit specialist later that week. I gave him several documents including the Council of Foundation’s Conflict of Interest Policy and the Nevada State Attorney General’s Guide to Non-Profits. I heavily advised him to read these documents in preparation for his meeting.

I went on vacation with a clear conscience. It was not my decision to make but my responsibility to ensure he was fully informed.

Apparently while I was gone, the founder recognized that moving forward with the non-profit private foundation would jeopardize everything he had developed, created and dedicated his life to. Thus, the non-profit private foundation died with only an EIN number to mark its grave.

It was the right decision to make. I’m proud to have assisted in that process. I’m proud of the founder to make this tough decision.

And I’m back on the job hunt once again.

Value of Inclusion, Support and Planning

It amazes me to read about how a major corporation’s executive management ignores the value of planning for changes, supporting and including their own managers and front line staff. Anytime the executive management realizes that changes need to occur to the business operations, it appears that they ignore the very people who can provide them with the insight, the expertise and the knowledge necessary to make those changes for the betterment of the business and its customers.

In the case study, “The Relation Between BPR and ERP Systems: A Failed Project,” once again, executive management and the Board of Directors decide that things need to change in order to turn the business around. They relied on a potential vendor’s salesperson’s advice to “save the day” and provide the Silver Bullet to magically transform the company into something they didn’t even define. But! It was going to be better!!!

Were they really that stupid? Apparently so. After spending over $280 million dollars and a couple of years, the only positive thing that this company has to show for its investment is a very expensive version of Quickbooks and only for Accounts Payable.

Mistakes made include:

a.       Failure to define exactly what changes needed to made

b.       Failure to fully support the project manager by giving him the political power, clear definitions and two-way open lines of communication

c.        Relying upon the new computer system to redesign business practices ignoring current processes and company culture

d.       Forcing the new ERP system into the company, even in places where it was clearly not needed

e.        Not including or consulting any middle management or front line staff

f.        Continuing to throw money at the problem rather than determining what the problem was

g.        Bringing a couple hundred outside consultants to implement the system without including any in-house staff at any level

Even recent research suggests that as a company grows, so should its’ information system. Just as a company brings on additional staff, new product offerings, opens new offices or outsources any of its practices, a company must consider how their information technology system will adapt and grow with the company’s changes. “The selection of system development model and processes should support frequent change requirements, software reuse and controlled maintainability of information systems. … Changes occurring in organizations need to change information systems.” (Manchanda et al, 2009, page 2). However, this research supports the fact that referencing the current processes are essential to continue to grow and prosper.

In addition, companies must incorporate coping skills for all levels of staff to help ensure a successful large-scale change. The authors of “Abating the Consequences of Managerialism on the Forgotten Employees: The Issues of Support, Control, Coping and Pay” concluded that overlooking inclusion, coping techniques, social welfare and other emotional factors will have an impact on organizational commitment, job satisfaction and psychological health. Any movement, either positive or negative, in one area will heavily influence the others as they are strongly correlated. (Noblet, McWilliams, 2006, page 13). Take care of the human element and the system will follow.

Any executive manager would be very wise to include members of each employment level. Not one person or group of people knows everything about a company. Bring in other voices and avoid group think. Otherwise, why even be in business?

 

Works Cited

 

Manchanda, Sanjeev, S. B. Singh, and Mayank Dave. “Change Management and Software Reuse Supportive ‘Genetic Information System Development and Maintenance’ Model.” International Journal of Software Engineering & Knowledge Engineering 19.1 (2009): 113-136. Academic Search Premier. EBSCO. Web. 22 Nov. 2010.

 

Noblet, Andrew J., John H. McWilliams, and John J. Rodwell. “Abating the Consequences of Managerialism on the Forgotten Employees: The Issues of Support, Control, Coping, and Pay.” International Journal of Public Administration 29.10/11 (2006): 911-930. Business Source Complete. EBSCO. Web. 22 Nov. 2010.

The Ideal Organization: Can It Be Real or Just A Dream?

Any organization has the following components: Purpose, System Structure/Culture, Leadership Behaviors, Followership Behaviors, Training, Empowerment, Responsibility, Accountability, Compensation/Commission Structures, Job Satisfaction and Performance Reviews.

Whether or not these various components are effective make the company a great place to contribute your time and talents or a place you would rather not be. During the course, we explored many different aspects of each component. The good, the bad and the atrocious were examined. We read and talked about case studies at real companies that face challenges as they struggle with changing business environments. We read and commented on blogs from advisors on real life leadership skills and behaviors. These advisors showcased how a manager can build up or tear down organizations. This paper addresses what the ideal organization would look like in terms of the 11 aspects stated above.

Purpose—Why Are We Here?

The Purpose of the company is what brings people together to create and build the business. The Purpose tells people why the company exists. It’s the foundation of the working relationships where there are influential relationships between leaders and followers who aim to make real changes to execute the purpose of the company. This Purpose is inspirational and clearly defined. I’ll help clarify what Purpose is by defining what it is not.

Many companies confuse Purpose with Vision, Mission and/or Values. Vision gives people a sense of where the company is heading. “We will be the industry leader by 2020” is an example of Vision. Vision is generally far off, designed during an executive retreat and while it gives the company direction, it is not the organization’s reason for existence.

A Mission Statement could be related to Purpose, however, it is generally filled with rhetoric, vague and meaningless words. A Mission Statement is rarely inspirational. “The mission of VideoPoker.com is to provide our members with information that will optimize their video poker playing fun and provide the best video poker games, just like the ones you see in the casino.” (www.videopoker.com/mission).

Expected behaviors are expressed in the Values Statement. Values guide people how others should be treated throughout the company and during interactions with customers and/or suppliers. Respect, honor, dignity, integrity, high standards of ethics, law-abiding, open communication, etc., are all behavior-driven words found within Values Statements. While useful and, frankly baffling that this type of behavior needs to be explicitly defined to adults, Values Statements help support Purpose, but is not the company Purpose.

The most inspirational and moving Purpose I have had the privilege of supporting comes from Landmark Education. “Landmark Education is a global educational enterprise committed to the fundamental principle that people have the possibility of success, fulfillment, and greatness.” (www.landmarkeducation.com/about_landmark_company_overview.jsp emphasis added.)

Landmark Education’s Purpose is clear, simple and inspirational. People, paid staff and thousands of volunteers from all around the globe, get behind this Purpose as they are also committed to the same thing. Everything falls underneath Purpose. The Ideal Organization will have a similar Purpose.

System Structure/Company Culture—The Context

            Company leadership creates, determines and enforces the System Structure. This System Structure defines how the Purpose will be executed. The System Structure encompasses the Mission Statement, Values and the Vision along with the rest of the components mentioned at the beginning. The System Structure gives the boundaries of behaviors—good or bad, effective or ineffective—for all people within the organization. For small or newer companies, this System can be more malleable than at larger, more established firms.

            Within the System Structure, the Company Culture is born. The unwritten expectations and the peer pressure influences arise and create the Company Culture. The System Structure can be thought of as the building of the company: the walls, the floors, the ceiling, the cubes, etc., whereas the Company Culture is the air contained within that building. It can be poisonous or it can be life-giving depending upon which behaviors are encouraged. And it all starts with Leadership Behaviors.

Leadership Behaviors

            It is within this realm that the Purpose, the System Structure and the Company Culture is either built or torn down. Leadership Behaviors create the Company Culture within the System Structure. Poor behaviors lead to a poisonous culture whereas excellent behaviors bring inspiration along with inter-personal connections and a well run company.

Leadership Behaviors permeate the entire company—from the front lobby to the executive suite—leadership can be found at every level, regardless of title, position, seniority and experience.

The Ideal Organization would foster socialized power where resources are shared freely, information is exchanged without fear of repercussion, and the whole truth is spoken and supported. Hidden agendas, self-serving politics and sabotage of other staff are not only discouraged but outwardly punished. Bullies are fired immediately.

As politics are unavoidable in any organization, the Ideal Organization would foster Organizational Politics to use relationships to influence and foster growth, innovation, cooperation and effective communication. This can be fostered by creating a System and Culture by ensuring commitment, building information-intensive environments, playing coach and facilitator all focused on human interaction and learning. (Strategies of Effective New Product Team Leaders, pg 37, Table 1.) The Ideal Organization teaches everyone the importance of contribution to the Purpose and how each person can make a difference.

The most vital Leadership Behavior is Integrity. As a leader, regardless of position or title, integrity is crucial to any successful, meaningful relationship worth engaging. Integrity is more than just doing what you say you will do when you say you will do it. It also entails communicating not being able to accomplish the task when originally stated. An essential piece that many people do not realize as part of having integrity is acknowledging and taking responsibility for mistakes, errors in communication, missed deadlines, etc. When this acknowledgement occurs, integrity is put back in place and the relationship can move forward. Not acknowledging or being responsible is like frosting on a mud cake. As noted in my previous writings, without integrity, there is no workability within a relationship. If there is no workability, then there is no relationship. The foundation of any relationship is integrity. A leader with solid integrity can take a group of people to grand achievements.

In one of our readings, the author describes Servant Leadership by the leader asking three simple questions: “What projects are you working on? What obstacles are you encountering? What resources can I provide?” It’s the last question that turns this into a servant-type role. The leader is not looking to be the hero or to be the sole provider of everything. On the contrary, the Servant Leader is willing to impart as much as possible such as information, resources, controls, power and credit. A similar approach is asking, “What can I do for you?”

Other key Leadership Behaviors include management through active participation, a willingness to change anything and everything, keeps things in perspective in terms of Purpose, doing real work and creates development opportunities not only for the staff but for the company as well. Asking questions and being open to all answers, feedback and complaints. Without new information, the organization can become incestuous. It takes courage to question and sometimes even more courage to provide the truth over being silent.

Leaders need Followers just as much as Followers need Leaders. However, when a leader attacks a follower, that leader will soon find there is no one around to lead.

Followership Behaviors

            But the entire responsibility in the Ideal Organization does not rest completely on the leadership. Followers have to possess the courage to speak up when Leadership steers away from the Purpose. This facet alone is what sets a Partner/Follower apart from a “Yes” Man. Having the courage to speak up when it matters, in the face of opposition, brings the Purpose back into focus at a critical time.

In the Ideal Organization, Followers complain, brainstorm and dig into the issue in order to solve obstacles in the way of the Purpose. These steps are essential to learning and growing within the Ideal Organization (Pfeffer & Sutton). This critical thinking can be accomplished with respect, honor and a sharing of responsibility.

            In additional, behaviors of the Follower can be characterized as being highly supportive as the Follower implements or partners with the Leaders. In the Ideal Organization, Followers are effective in that they are responsible for themselves and for their work, can work efficiently without close supervision, and actively support Leadership Behaviors to create a System and Company Culture that is life-giving.

Training & Development—Teach Me

            High quality Leadership Behaviors and Followership Behaviors are generally taught and can be learned. The Ideal Organization places a high priority on training and development. People come from a wide field of backgrounds; all have talents, skills and technological knowledge. When they arrive at the Ideal Organization, it’s vital that they are trained to learn the System Structure and the Company Culture as well as the behaviors essential to thrive. While personality traits do not change significantly, behaviors can change fairly easily. Clear expectations of behavior are taught and reinforced through honest, immediate feedback on a continual basis.

Documentation and studies show a strong correlation between company success and training. The Ideal Organization teaches both leaders and followers how to swim successfully, how to look out for sharks in the water and how to win. Training and Development occur on a frequent, regular basis both on the company grounds and off-site. Subjects are taught by both in-house and outside firms to allow for healthy breeding of thoughts, ideas, innovations and theory.

Empowerment—Let Me Do It

            Perhaps one of the most difficult aspects to execute is Empowerment. It takes courage to give Empowerment but even more courage to let go and allow Followers to make mistakes and fall. Micromanagement is the opposite of Empowerment, which is founded on trust. Lt. Campbell wrote of his leadership in Joker One and how he empowered his Marines to do the right thing. By training them to think critically and analyze the combat situation and giving them the authority to act as necessary, Lt. Campbell’s unit was extremely successful their extreme war zone. Had he chosen to micromanage, Lt. Campbell’s men would have suffered far more injuries and deaths while waiting for orders in crucial situations. He expressed his confidence in the Marines and set very high standards of performance.

Responsibility and Accountability—Yes, I Did That

            In the Ideal Organization, Empowerment is given with Responsibility and Accountability. Responsibility is tied at the hip with Integrity and Locus of Control. Leadership and Followership Behaviors exhibit responsibility for the execution of the Purpose, System Structure and Company Culture. In order to improve processes within the System Structure, actions are initiated to promote values and purposeful changes.

            Responsibility is looking within oneself to determine what behaviors contributed to the situation and then claiming those behaviors. “Yes, I did this.” In the Ideal Organization, there is no reason to hide or sweep things under the carpet. Ideally, Leadership removes the fear of retribution when something goes wrong. Leadership is aware that the cause of the mishap probably lies within the System.

            Being Accountable for behaviors is the other side of being Responsible. Accountability allows for rewards and punishments for behaviors accordingly for Followers. However, ultimately Leadership is held Accountable for everything within the organization.

Salary & Commission—Cashing In

            As much as we like to think that people will work for free at this Ideal Organization, it’s important to be quite realistic. Although salary can be a motivating factor when considering a career change, it is a necessary part of life. In the Ideal Organization, one factor in calculating salary would be how often this position interacts with the customer. Paying the front line staff well would serve the Purpose and the customers well. Commissions would be very carefully crafted to encourage the behaviors that serve the Purpose, not someone’s ego or pockets.

Job Satisfaction—I Like It Here!

            When all of the above factors serve the Purpose and the behaviors give life to the System Structure and Company Culture, Job Satisfaction would be incredibly high. After all, this is the Ideal Organization. When either Leaders or Followers are highly satisfied in their work, the commitment to the Purpose is also high. They are directly proportional and correlated. Turnover drops or is almost eliminated. Close relationships develop and the company thrives. Once again, when management takes care of the staff, the staff will take care of the customers, who will then take care of business. It all goes back to the Service-Profit Chain and the development of customer loyalty.

Performance Review—Applause Please!

            At this point, the Annual Performance Review is only a formal documentation of each quarterly review. By providing continual feedback, behaviors can be quickly altered or solidified. Employees unwilling to change poor behaviors are fired far more quickly rather than allowing them to poison the Company Culture or teach others that poor behaviors are acceptable.

The Buck Stops Here

            In the end, the foundation of any company or organization lies in the integrity of its leadership and to the Purpose. Everything else rests upon holding integrity to the Purpose. The Ideal Organization knows very clearly why it exists and communicates that in a way that is inspiring. It’s up to the Leadership to design a System Structure and develop a Company Culture to fully execute that Purpose with integrity.

The Right Investment–Staff, Staff, Staff

This week’s case study is about another retailer…this time the Men’s Warehouse is showcased. Wow! A retailer that gets it. Right along with Southwest Airlines, Men’s Warehouse takes their staff seriously and actually cares.

Training is heavy at this retailer, at least it was in the mid-1990s. If I worked there and I heard that I could travel, all expenses paid, for training and mixing and mingling with the corporate staff.. Boy howdy! wouldn’t that be great movitation!

Training programs really show how much a company invests in their human resources. I’ve heard of companies that just throw someone in the pool and shout, “SWIM!” What amazes me how those companies wonder why their staff flail, work hard at treading water and ultimately drown while asking for a lifesaver. How about teaching someone how to swim, the temperature of the water and where the sharks hang out?

Although each new hire comes to the company with their set of skills, talents and experiences, each company has its processes, rules, behaviors, culture. Some of those things are written and most are tribal knowledge. If there is no training or coaching, the learning curve is much higher and steeper.

As I’ve said many times before, when management takes care of the staff, the staff will take care of the customers, who then reward management with increased sales and longer customer loyalty.

I realize that the shareholders want their investment to pay off. I totally get that. What I don’t get is why many executive managers and middle managers seem to be blind that the staff want the company to be successful too. No company–no job/career. It’s the people that make the company, not the shareholders.

Ever hear of a customer writing to the company to say what a great job that shareholder did? Or complained about a shareholder? I never have. But customers write letters and emails about the staff. Customers interact with staff.

Want to really impact the top and the bottom lines? Invest in the staff.

Thanks for reading.

Elaine

How The Rubber Meets the Road

I grew up in Canton, Ohio: a place for fantic footballs fans and one of the Rust Belt towns in Northeastern Ohio. About 30 minutes north is Akron. Akron used to be known for being the Rubber Capital of the World as the world’s tire manufacturers were headquartered there. Ohio is a manufacturing state. Or was until many of the jobs went overseas.

I am surprised that any serious manufacturing is still happening in Ohio, let alone Lima. Lima (pronounced just like the bean) isn’t exactly located in a happening spot. It’s about a 100 miles from anywhere in any direction.

The case study took us on a tour of the factory of its organization and who is in charge of what. The human resources director has her work cut out for her. The floor workers are unionized. The floor managers have no power. The general supervisors bark orders and demands. It’s interesting to note that the highest turnover rate is not on the floor, but at the next level up at the floor manager step. And she wonders why.

There is no training. There is no communication from the union. There is no support from above. There is no respect from above or below. There is resentment. There is a nice paycheck. There is immense pressure. There is no help, no understanding, no resources.

And she wonders why people leave??? Are you kidding me???

First of all, many factory workers aren’t exactly the brightest bulbs in the string of lights. I know. I grew up with them. And like children, they will push the limits as far as possible. When caught, they go to Mr. Union Boss and cry. “Oh! Mr. Supervisor is picking on me!!!” And then Mr. Union Boss pats them on the head, gives them a cookie and off goes factory worker back to work. Mr. Union Boss says nothing to help Mr. Supervisor but keeps a log of Mr. Supervisor’s “bullying.” Meanwhile, factory worker is sticking his tongue out at Mr. Supervisor and going “nanner, nanner.”

Wow. This sounds like a child running to Mom for protection from Dad. I don’t know about you, but I’m not at work to babysit.

The key thing is that this system leaves Mr. Supervisor flapping in the breeze for all to point at and laugh.

If I were the HR director, I would set up a meeting with all of the floor supervisors, another meeting with all of the union bosses and then a third meeting with both of them together. Training of what is in the Union contract would be very helpful to the floor supervisors. The Union needs to support the floor supervisor in bringing factory employee behaviors in line.

A child finds very little wiggle room when both parents are united and soon complies.

Communication must happen between the two. Support on both sides needs to be shown, otherwise the turnover rate will continue at the same pace, if not increase. One of the most expensive disruptions to any company is turnover. If the Union really wants its workers to continue to have jobs, it’s vital that the Union work hand-in-hand with the company. It’s essential to company survival and being able to thrive.

Thanks for reading.

Elaine

We’re Gonna Axe Who?

Recently we hear about this company laying off these workers and that company laying off those workers. Close friends and family report how they got laid off and how long they had to wait on hold with unemployment to file for benefits.

I wouldn’t want to be in the boardroom when these decisions are made. I’m not sure how well I could sleep at night knowing that my choice has such deep ramifications.

How are these decisions made? Some say just drop the bottom 10% of the org chart. Or cut a certain amount of salaries? Or cut all the middle managers?

It’s rare that senior management gets the axe. Why is that? They are the ones with the biggest salaries. They are the ones that come and go as they please. And frankly, sometimes, I wonder what they heck they really do. They avoid phone calls. Don’t really respond to emails. Bark orders and make judgements that make no operating sense to the people who have to execute the orders.

Many of the blogs I read talk about management and how, in general, how they are ineffective, especially in terms of leadership.

So why are they the ones who get to stay and the workers, the front line staff, get the axe?

Companies could save millions this way rather than thousands. Think about it. A typical executive earns, let’s say, $125,000 annual salary, not including benefits. A typical front line employee earns $30,000. You could axe only 1 employee for the same savings as cutting 4 employees.

I would want to impact as few families as possible. Ten bucks says the executive has savings whereas the front line employee is living hand to mouth.

If I was in that boardroom, I wonder if I would have enough cajones to suggest this.

Interesting idea, though.

Thanks for reading.

Elaine

Want To Be Inspiration? Do The Right Thing.

This week I read several articles on men doing the right thing. Like a Marine Colonel putting his men first before the mission. Or the Army Supply Lieutenant taking care of two refugees at the risk of a dishonorable discharge. Or a CEO announcing the company won’t make projections months before he is required by law to do so. 

Why must we choose between doing the right thing and whatever or whomever says otherwise? I ponder this on a regular basis.

We all read stories sent into our email boxes about how a solider or whomever did something that impacted another’s life in such a profound way that it moves us, inspires us and touches us. Sometimes the story even brings tears to our eyes and hearts.

And yet, when the rubber meets the road, we are pressured into doing something completely different. It could be the standard answer, “That’s against company policy. There’s nothing I can do about it.”

Once while working at a small retail store, a customer came in to make a return on a special order. It’s the store’s policy that we do not take returns or exchanges on any special orders. He ordered a set of very special matching outfits for himself and his fiance. As I listened to the gentleman explain that she died three days before their wedding from some sort of cancer, I knew the right thing to do was to give him store credit and a hug.

When I explained to the store owner what happened, I was shocked. The store owner questioned me heavily and gave me the third degree. “You know we DON’T take exchanges or returns on special orders. We’ll never sell those items. Do you really think she died?”

At that point, I was so dumbfounded all I could say was “Yes. I believe that she died. If you only could have spoken with him.” Why would someone lie about their fiance dying???

I think I was on Year 4 out of almost 6 working for this store. I thought I would have the owner’s backing. Of course, the owner would understand this very unusual circumstance. I was amazed that I was wrong.

(By the way, we sold all the items within six months or less. Plus the gentleman came back several weeks later to thank me for my compassion and to use his store credit.)

My respect for the store owner was rocked that day. Supporting me to do the right thing was not a concern, rather the income statement was more important than taking care of a fellow human heart.

Yes, it’s important to have rules and policies and bosses and staff. I totally get that. But when faced between “The Company Policy” and doing the right thing, I will choose the right thing several times over.

As I think back on the above customer service situation and others where I chose the right thing, I don’t feel guilty. I don’t have that regret of wishing I should have done something different. I believe doing the right thing gives me peace in my heart.

Thanks for reading.

Elaine

The Disease of Power

Let’s think for a minute…what would be the best position to have lots of power with virtually no way of getting fired?

How about being a dean?

Just think…you get to make all kinds of philosophical theories, policies, gifts, power brokering and Ivory Tower thinking all the while being nice and cozy and untouchable in your tweed jackets with elbow patches.

And everyone wants to be on your list. You know…The Dean’s List.

The Dean’s List of favorite students, teachers, administrative assistants, research pet projects, interns, etc. Who wouldn’t want to be on The Dean’s List?

My last semester while obtaining my Bachelor’s Degree at the University of Nevada, Reno was in Spring of 1997. I earned entrance into the Journalism academic fraternity and was invited to the awards dinner. My best friend attended with me. As we sat down, I dove into the salad. My friend opened the evening’s program.

Brian: Hey! You made The Dean’s List!

Elaine: We have a Dean’s List???!

Turns out I was on the inaugural list. Wow! I beamed with pride.

Our Dean at the time was James Gentry. Some people got to call him Jimmy but he was Dean Gentry to me, being a student and all. In my three years at the J-School, Dean Gentry was accessible, open, willing to listen and work things out for students and teachers alike. Jimmy did not have Dean’s Disease.

While registering for my last semester of classes, I needed to take Media Law for my major and a COBOL programming class for my minor. They met at the same time, on Fridays with only one section offered. I talked to both profs about alternating weeks. The J-School prof was willing. “The highest you could earn is a B.” The B-School prof was not willing at all.

So I made an appointment with Dean Gentry and explained my situation. I flushed out all my options and needed his help. After reviewing my file of classes and grades, he pronouced, “Go take Media Ethics.” Cool. A 400 level class traded for a 200 level class. The best part: I got to graduate on time.

At UNR, the professors and teachers were able to speak freely and it was very, very rare that I heard a harsh word, not even a frustration expressed when referring to Dean Gentry.

Since then, Dean Gentry left the University in 1998 or 1999. The Journalism school has gone through five or six new deans since. Two of them died, one of cancer and the other a horrific car accident. The others…well…they didn’t quite measure up to Dean Gentry.

I hope some day my beloved J-School will find another Dean Gentry.

Thanks for reading.

Elaine

The Diamonds are at Harrah’s

I’ve been living in Reno, Nevada for over 16 years. We have two Harrah’s properties close-by: Downtown and South Lake Tahoe. Anyone who has lived here for any length of time knows that Reno is a small town. It’s a small town because my people know your people who know my people. The advertising agencies seem to trade account reps regularly. I think it’s kinda funny.

As a contrast, employees at Harrah’s don’t move from casino to casino. They stay put. Harrah’s is a great property. Good location, decent parking garage, typical casino decor. But talk to the folks on the gaming floor. Ask them, “How long have you worked here?” “25 years.” “36 years.” “12 years.” You get the picture. People stay with this company.

After reading this week’s case study and article (Diamonds in the Data Mine & Gary Loveman & Harrah’s Entertainment), I can see why. When the leader of the company is willing to support you with the resources you need to really, I mean really, get the job done, I wouldn’t want to leave either. Phil Satre and Gary Loveman are two guys I would love to have around.

Apparently when Gary Loveman came on board, the various properties were more than corporate silos–they are considered “fiefdoms managed by feudal lords with occasional interruptions from the king or queen who passed through town.” What a wondeful description! I mean really…how many chain stores, satellite offices, manufacturing plants, corporate divisions are operated and treated like fiefdoms?

I know from my experience while working for a chain restaurant when someone from “corporate” was visiting, the entire management team and staff were crazy cleaning and stressing out afraid that the “corporate office” was going to close the place down if something was amiss. Looking back, yes, I wanted the restaurant to look great but OY!

This sentence alone is my Diamond: “Gary created a much stronger sense of urgency. He created a mindset that if a property was struggling to meet its financial objectives and grow market share, corporate would offer resources that could quickly diagnose what the issues are and correct the problems,” Tim Wilmott, COO, Harrah’s Entertainment. (Gary Loveman & Harrah’s Entertainment, page 8, Nov. 2003).

Further in the case study, the properties helped each other out. A struggling property would visit and spend time with a successful one. Sharing of what works and what doesn’t work; a high level of success became the standard. Gary didn’t settle for mediocrity. So much more can be achieved when resources are shared, not hoarded.

Mariah Power hired me back and I am now working as the Western Regional Sales Representative. I am responsible for 46 dealers throughout 19 Western States. I am that corporate level Gary is created for the 26 Harrah’s properties. I have the opportunity to be THE resource for these 46 dealers. I want to offer information and resources freely and frequently.

My strong suits are being funny, being resourceful and being tenacious. (I’ve been called tenacious as a pit bull.) I absolutely LOVE providing someone a key resource–whether its a restaurant recommendation or an effective marketing plan–I live for that.

So what’s my point? My point is that if one man can change the company culture in an age-old, heavily controlled industry…well, I can do it too.

Giddy-up. Thanks for reading.

Elaine

Group Peer Pressure

Holy cow! I knew that teenage peer pressure was intense but after reading this article on the pre-Iraq war intelligence, I had no idea that peer pressure could be so intense that our country was put in serious jeapordy.

Oh sure…I listened to NPR talk about the reports and such but I didn’t connect to the behavior of intelligence staff succumbing to the pressure of their supervisors.

Worker:  Hmmm. This doesn’t seem to support the theory that Iraq is doing what you all say they are doing.

Supervisor: We don’t care what you think. Just make the data fit.

I didn’t like Bush and I like him even less now. Amazing how supervisors can “make” a person do something that is completely against the evidence. I knew supervisors had power…but this super power is dangerous.

I don’t think I’ve ever had a work situation like that. And I’m thankful that I haven’t.

Thanks for reading.

Elaine